Rules for time-limited games

[revised 2023-11-03]

Go to a detailed explanation of the FIPJP rules for time-limited games.

Big competitions have a problem. Even with a single-elimination format, many rounds of games must be played in order to reduce the field of competitors to the eight teams that will play in the quarter-finals. Most games in one round need to have finished before the survivors can be paired up for the next round to begin. This can seriously slow down a large competition. [See the comment by Jac Verheul (below).]

One goal for big competitions, then, is to find a way to play short-form games— games that can be played in a limited and predictable amount of time. There are three ways to do it.

  • You can play to a winning score of less than 13.
  • You can limit the time allowed for the game.
  • You can limit the number of menes (ends) played.

In the last two cases, if the allotted amount of time or number of menes has completed and the score is tied, then you need a mechanism for breaking the tie. A natural suggestion is to play one additional “tie-breaker mene”. Unfortunately, this cannot guarantee that the tie will be broken. The mene can still end without either team scoring a point— the jack could be killed while both teams still have unplayed boules; or the mene could end with a null point due to an equidistant boules situation or all boules being shot out-of-bounds.

One way to enhance the effectiveness of a tie-breaker mene is to add a special rule that during the tie-breaker mene the jack is not allowed to go dead. If the jack is hit out-of-bounds, it is put back on the terrain and the game continues. (If it was marked, it is put back on the mark. Otherwise, it is put on the terrain near the spot where it crossed the dead-ball line.) This still isn’t entirely satisfactory— the mene can still end with a null point. Still, it is an improvement, and perhaps good enough for practical purposes.


Older Rules for Time-limited games

For many years competition organizers looked to the CEP (Confédération Européenne de Pétanque, the organizer of the Eurocup) for a model for how to organize time-limited games.

The first CEP rule was that, when playing time-limited games, when the time-limit was announced (by a whistle, say), any mene in progress was played to its finish. At that point, if one of the teams was in the lead, then that team was the winner. If the score was tied, one additional tie-breaker mene was played. The problem with this procedure was that as a game approached its time-limit, the team in the lead would often deliberately play slowly, “running out the clock” and limiting their opponents’ opportunities to score more points. The CEP apparently considered this tactic to be contrary to the spirit of the game. Mike Pegg reports

When timed games were first introduced, one more end was played after the whistle was blown. Teams would deliberately play slowly, taking a full minute etc., so that the opponent had no chance of winning or drawing with them. To prevent this sort of tactic, it was decided to allow for two extra ends.


Current Rules for Time-limited games

In the current rules for time-limited games, games are played to the normal winning score of 13. Any game that hasn’t finished when the time limit is reached, then switches to a limited-number of menes (ends, rounds) model.

  1. Games are played as they normally are. When one team achieves the winning score of 13, the game is finished and the team with the winning score is the winner.
     
  2. For any game that has not finished when the time-limit is reached, the teams finish playing the mene that is currently in progress. At that point, if neither team has achieved a winning score of 13, the game continues for two more “extra” menes. During those menes, if one of the teams reaches 13 points, the game is over and that team wins.
     
  3. After the second extra mene, if neither of the teams has reached 13 points, but one of the teams has more points than the other, the game is over and the team with the most points wins.
     
  4. After the second extra mene, if the score is tied, the game plays a “final” mene. In this mene, special rules apply— the jack is not allowed to go dead. (If the jack is moved to a place where it is dead, it is put back on its original mark and play continues.) If the mene ends with one team having more points than the other, the game is over and the team with the most points wins.
     
  5. After the final mene, the score may still be tied if the mene ends in a null point. In such a situation, the teams play another “final” mene.
     

Go to a detailed explanation of the FIPJP rules for time-limited games.


Where these rules are specified

As of August 2023, these rules are specified by the CEP (the European Petanque Confederation) on the CEP documents page. (Under the “Championships” heading, see the link for “Singles, Doubles, and Triples: Rules”. It will take you to a pdf file whose internal name is “European Championship Regulations 2023-24”)

18.04 The time limit for each game is:
     • Singles: 45 minutes
    • Doubles: 60 minutes
    • Triples: 75 minutes
18.05 In each format, the teams will be informed that the time limit has expired.
18.06 At the end of the time limit, the current end will be completed and if no team has reached 13 points, two more ends will be played.
18.07 If the score is tied, after the two additional ends, the teams play an extra end.
18.08 During this extra end, the jack cannot become dead (out of play). If the jack goes out of the defined playing area it is returned to its original position.


As of August 2023, these rules are specified by the FIPJP in the FIPJP rules for the world championships, the Règlement des Championnats du Monde. (On the FIPJP web page), click on “MENU” in the upper right-hand corner, then on “Rules and Regulations”, then on “Rules Championships”. Then look for Article 19.

All games of the world championships are played in 13 points, with the exception of the games for which a limited time is applied: one hour and a quarter for the men’s world championship in triplets, one hour for the other world championships in triplets and for the doubles world championships, 45 minutes for the individual world championships.

If neither team has reached 13 points before the end of the fixed time, it will be contested for up to two additional ends. In the event of a tie at the end of the extra ends there will be a final end in which the jack, if it can be moved, will never be lost.


An interesting consequence of a seemingly-unrelated rules change

Before 2020, a thrown jack was required to be at least a meter or half a meter from a side dead-ball line. In 2020 the rules changed, allowing the jack to be thrown right next to a side dead-ball line. This introduced an interesting new tactic into time-limited games. Now, at the start of the first or second extra mene, if a team is leading (with a higher score than their opponents) they may choose to throw the jack very close to a side string. Then, rather than pointing with their first boule, they shoot the jack out-of-bounds. This ends the mene without changing the score. Doing this, a team that is in the lead at the beginning of the first or second extra mene can— if they have a good shooter— virtually lock in their victory.

8 thoughts on “Rules for time-limited games

  1. It’s not true that all of the games in a round must have finished before match-ups between the survivors can be arranged and the next round can begin. Or, in other words, before the draw of the next round can be done.

    In France they use numbers for each game in the next round. This number can be drawn two times by two different winners of a round (or losers if there is a losers tournament). As soon as a number has been drawn for the second time, the new game between these teams can start and you don’t have two wait until all games in that round have finished.

    Normally, long games will be followed by shorter ones. It’s a smart way to do the draws in this way in order to win time, instead of shorten the games themselves.

    With the same result, you can also use so-called ‘KO-trees’ with just one draw at the beginning of a tournament. Big disadvantage: teams will know from the beginning who may be their next opponents… To avoid this, you can use the so-called ‘Moroccan schedules’, with which it’s more difficult to predict who will be your next opponent.

      • Hi Steve,

        I saw this way of draw for the first time 25 years ago when I accompanied a Dutch team that was invited by the former French magazine Sport Petanque to participate on the National tournament of Poitier, March 1987. Our team had beaten the French champions at the World Championship 1986 in Epinal, the legendary Bébert de Cagnes…

        In the beginning I understand nothing how the draw was done, but after several minutes of looking very well, the penny dropped! Some time later I described and explained the method in the Organizers Manual that I wrote for the Dutch federation. About 8 years again, I made a new version with the ‘Moroccan’ schedules (that I got from a Moroccan friend and I made Dutch versions of it).

        But it’s a pity, or not to say a big shame, that not many clubs in the Netherlands use it. Most tournaments here are based on a damned ‘system‘ of five games that are drawn before, without taking into account the results of the games… That’s life also…

        Cheers, Jac

  2. Hi Jules – excellent article as usual.

    Probably nonsensical but for ‘non-timed games’, what if a whistle were to blow after the conclusion of the first game to finish in that round? The rest of the pairings would then have to complete the end they are on plus one or two extra ends.

    Also, can anyone enlighten me on the so called ‘Moroccan Schedules’?

    • Jac says that he got the idea from a Moroccan friend, so he called them “Moroccan” schedules. I’ll bet that that term isn’t widely known.

      Basically, it is a method for setting up a double-elimination competition, with a concours (A) tournament and a consolante (B) tournament. Losers of the concours don’t move to the consolante. They either get eliminated or (depending on how the competition is set up) they move to another set of tournaments, C and D.

      I think that this is probably similar to the system used at the Amelia Island Open, which also, as I recall, has tournaments A, B, C, and D.

      Jac has built an Excel spreadsheet which, if you’re comfortable with Excel, should make it easy to create a schedule for a competition.

    • What if the whistle was blown after the conclusion of the first game to finish? Rather than after a specific amount of time?

      An interesting idea! In theory it should prevent the “time-wasting”, “running out the clock” behavior that bothered the EuroCup organizers, since nobody could predict when the time limit would expire.

Post a comment, or send us a message

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.